Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 509 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s 71.9 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a little bit bigger screen.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 2 TB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is very similar to the battery duration in Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has a way tinier sensor which gives a way lower image and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher 108 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.