Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| 2025-04-08 | -- |
| -- | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having an 80.9 score against 71.9. These devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy S6 Active has a much more vibrant screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a much smaller screen.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy S6 Active features a much better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also has a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way higher resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.