Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), getting a global score of 75.8 against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a much better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has 4 less cpu cores and lesser RAM. The Galaxy S7 Active has a much better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a much smaller screen and much worse brightness.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.