Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2025-04-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s overall score of 71.9. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has an incredibly better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a little smaller screen.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a much larger sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.