Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having an 80.1 score against 71.9. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features an extremely better processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a way smaller display. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 2 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a way bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.