Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s 71.9 global score. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 2 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a lot better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a way better video quality.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.