Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 425 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is way better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), getting an 88.5 score against 71.9. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy Z Flip has a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). Both have a display of the same size.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a really superior processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and a lot higher resolution camera.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.