Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| -- | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 372 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having a 94.6 score against 71.9. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a little bit bigger display. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 2 TB.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.