Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2021-08-11 |
| -- | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| -- | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 372 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), with a 90.6 score against 71.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a lot better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a little larger screen.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a very superior processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.