Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2025-04-08 | 2018-04-05 |
| -- | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| -- | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 483 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), with a 79 score against 71.9. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15, counting with some nice extra features.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has a much smaller screen and much lower brightness. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a very superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 2 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) captures much clearer photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) also counts with a larger camera aperture, a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution and a way larger sensor.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.