Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-05-08 |
| -- | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 484 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is way better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), having a 90.1 score against 71.9. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because it has a quite larger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an extremely better processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) have extremely similar battery durations. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.