Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| PANTONE Gibraltar Sea and PANTONE Surf the Web | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SM6475-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), with a score of 81.1 against 71.9. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has Android 15 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025). Both of them have a same size screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2025), because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 2 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a battery duration that is just as good as Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)'s battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.