Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Moto G10, getting a 91.3 score against 75.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than Moto G10, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G10, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G10, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G10 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.