Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G10, with a global score of 98.9 against 75.1. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Motorola Moto G10 were only released with a couple of months difference, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is just a little heavier but also thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior hardware performance than Moto G10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Moto G10, because it has a little bigger screen, a lot better pixels number per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G10, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Moto G10 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better video quality and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.