Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-02-16 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 is a bit better than the Moto G10, with a score of 77.6 against 75.1. Galaxy Note4's design is lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G10, even though it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a much better display than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features just a bit better processing power than Moto G10, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Moto G10 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G10 also has a way bigger camera aperture, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Moto G10 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G10 has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 55% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.