Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Moto G10, with a general score of 95.4 against 75.1. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Moto G10. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Moto G10, because it has a quite bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a way better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G10 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a battery duration that's very similar to Moto G10's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.