Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto G10's 75.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Motorola Moto G10, but Samsung was able to make it a little lighter and much thinner. Galaxy Z Flip features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G10, because it has a way higher count of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit larger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with more storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G10 counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G10 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G10 also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.