Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G10, with a general score of 92.3 against 75.1. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a bit lighter and much thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G10, even when both of them were only released 6 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite superior hardware performance than Moto G10, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a sharper screen than Moto G10, because it has a way greater display pixels density, a bit larger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Moto G10 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G10 also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Moto G10 counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.