Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than Moto G10's 75.1 score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Moto G10 were released with only a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is much heavier but also noticeably thinner than the Moto G10. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G10, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a more vivid display than Moto G10, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px, a larger screen and a greater count of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has more memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G10 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G10 also has a bigger aperture and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. Moto G10 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.