Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora Grey and Iridescent Pearl | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.56 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a lot better than Motorola Moto G10, with a global score of 90.6 against 75.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Motorola Moto G10 were released only 6 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is notably heavier but way thinner. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior CPU than Moto G10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better screen than Moto G10, because it has a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels, a greater pixels density and a bigger display. The Moto G10 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Moto G10 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.