Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-15 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G100 is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a overall score of 88.9 against 82.5. The Moto G100 is a noticeably newer phone than LG V30S ThinQ, although it's much heavier and incredibly thicker. These phones use Android OS, but Moto G100 has the older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola Moto G100 counts with just a little better processing power than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G100 also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Moto G100, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Motorola Moto G100 takes greater photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better 5760x3240 video definition, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality photos and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G100, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G100 counts with a very superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.