Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than the Moto G100, having a score of 90.7 against 88.9. Galaxy A52's body is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G100, even when they were only released 1 months apart. Motorola Moto G100 has a bit better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite higher pixel count per screen inch and a little higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
The Moto G100 counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G100 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G100 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A52, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Moto G100 also counts with a bigger aperture and a way higher 5760x3240 video resolution.
Galaxy A52's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Moto G100's one, both have a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and the same internal memory capacity. The Moto G100 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.