Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G100, getting a overall score of 91.3 against 88.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G100 has Android 11 version, giving you a couple nice extra features. Galaxy A52 5G's design is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G100, even though they were released only 1 months apart.
The Moto G100 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G100 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto G100 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, a bit higher display pixels density and a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Moto G100 count with similar storage capacity for games and applications, both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. Moto G100 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Moto G100 also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot higher 5760x3240 video definition.
The Moto G100 has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.