Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is just a bit better than Moto G100, with a score of 97.6 against 88.9. Galaxy Fold's construction is much thinner than Moto G100, although it's a lot heavier and was released just a little further than a year before. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Moto G100 has Android 11 version, offering some additional features.
Moto G100 has a little bit better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. The Moto G100 has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Fold, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has more storage to store more games and applications than Moto G100, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G100 captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a way better video definition and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Moto G100 has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.