Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than the Moto G100's 88.9 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Moto G100 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is thinner but a little bit heavier than the Moto G100, and they were released only a couple of months apart.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's processor is very similar to Moto G100's CPU, and although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 4 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G100, because it has a little larger display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little bit better pixel density.
Moto G100 has a slightly bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G100 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G100, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Moto G100 counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.