Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G100 is slightly better than Galaxy Note 3, getting an 88.9 score against 81.2. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Moto G100 has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version. Moto G100's body is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Note 3.
Motorola Moto G100 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and more processing cores. Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better screen than Moto G100, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite inferior number of pixels per screen inch and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Moto G100 has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G100 features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a much larger aperture for better photography in low light situations, a way higher 5760x3240 video quality and a way larger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.