Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G100 has an overall score of 88.9, which is better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G100 has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The Motorola Moto G100 design is way newer than the Galaxy Note 5's, although it's heavier and notably thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a better screen than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display density. The Moto G100 features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Moto G100 features a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores. Moto G100 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations, a way higher resolution back facing camera, a much better video resolution and a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Moto G100 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.