Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-15 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G100 has a score of 88.9, which is much better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 general score. Motorola Moto G100's construction is newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Moto G100 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G100 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch of display. The Moto G100 shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Moto G100 also has a lot higher video quality, a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Moto G100 features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G100 counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.