Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-15 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G100, with a general score of 89 against 88.9. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G100, despite of the fact that it was released around 20 months before. Moto G100 features a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bit higher display density, a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
Moto G100 features a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G100 has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note10. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Moto G100 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos, a lot higher 5760x3240 video quality and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Moto G100 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.