Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a little bit better than Moto G100's score of 88.9. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Moto G100 has Android 11 version, providing you some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is an older cellphone than Moto G100, but it is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. The Moto G100 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S20, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Moto G100 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G100 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, higher video frame rate and a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
Moto G100 has slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G100 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G100 features greater battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.