Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than Moto G100, getting a 98 score against 88.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older and a bit heavier cellphone than the Moto G100, but Samsung could make it a bit thinner anyway. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Moto G100 has Android 11, giving lots of additional features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Moto G100, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bit larger screen and a just a little greater pixels number in each display inch. The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G100 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G100, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Motorola Moto G100 feature similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.