Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G100's 88.9 score. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is newer, lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto G100. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G100 has Android 11 version, giving you a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Motorola Moto G100 has a bit better processor than Galaxy S22. They have a 8 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Moto G100 features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G100 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S22 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a camera with a lot worse resolution and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Moto G100 features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.