Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G100, getting a 95.4 score against 88.9. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G100 has Android 11, so it provides a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer and just a bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G100.
Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better display than Moto G100, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit larger screen and a little greater pixel count in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Moto G100, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Motorola Moto G100 has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto G100 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a battery life that's very similar to Moto G100's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.