Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-15 | -- |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G100 is a bit better than the Galaxy S25, having a overall score of 88.9 against 82.6. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G100 has an older 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Galaxy S25 has a much better screen than Moto G100, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater display pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. They have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM. The Motorola Moto G100 features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G100 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy S25 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
The Moto G100 has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.