Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-15 | -- |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.30 ounces | -- |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the Moto G100's score of 88.9. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Moto G100 has Android 11, giving a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and a lot thinner phone than Moto G100.
The Moto G100 has a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Moto G100, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a bit bigger display and a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G100, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The Moto G100 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a battery performance that is just as good as the Moto G100 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.