Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G100 is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a general score of 88.9 against 80.1. The Motorola Moto G100 design is newer, incredibly thinner and lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G100 has older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Moto G100 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G100 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking display than Moto G100, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display density.
Moto G100 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way better video quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Moto G100 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G100 has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.