Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G100 is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a score of 88.9 against 81. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide all the same operating system features. Motorola Moto G100's construction is newer, just a little lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Moto G100 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G100 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G100 features a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, the Motorola Moto G100 also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a little bigger screen.
The Moto G100 features a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Moto G100 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Moto G100 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way better video resolution.
Motorola Moto G100 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.