Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is a bit better than Moto G100's global score of 88.9. These devices have the same Android 11 operating system. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Moto G100, although they were released with only 8 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G100, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Moto G100 features a greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a processor that is very similar to the Motorola Moto G100 one, both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. Moto G100 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a lot better 5760x3240 video quality, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Moto G100 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.