Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G100, with a global score of 94.6 against 88.9. These devices include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably thinner but noticeably heavier than the Motorola Moto G100, and both of them were only released 7 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Moto G100 both feature really similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G100 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density. The Moto G100 has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Moto G100 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Motorola Moto G100 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a way higher 5760x3240 video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.