Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G100, with a 90.6 score against 88.9. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Motorola Moto G100 were only released with a couple of months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is heavier but way thinner than the Motorola Moto G100. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the user very similar operating system features.
The Motorola Moto G100 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. Motorola Moto G100 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto G100 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Moto G100 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much bigger aperture and a back camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G100 has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.