Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, with a global score of 88.1 against 86.2. Even though iPhone X is notably older than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. IPhone X has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Apple iPhone X counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone X features a bit superior CPU than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Moto G200 5G features a superior camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution camera in the back.
Moto G200 5G has a superior battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has an 84% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.