Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XS, getting an 86.2 score against 84.2. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body is incredibly newer than Apple iPhone XS's, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone XS has a bit better processor than Moto G200 5G, because although it has 2 less and slower cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone XS has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display. Moto G200 5G has a better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Moto G200 5G has a way bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Moto G200 5G has a much better battery life than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.