Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, getting a general score of 86.2 against 82.5. The Moto G200 5G body is way newer than Google Pixel 2 XL's, although it is thicker and heavier. The Moto G200 5G features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater pixels density. Google Pixel 2 XL's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as Moto G200 5G's one, both have equal internal memory.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a greater camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.