Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's overall score of 80.7. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body is incredibly newer than Google Pixel 3 XL's, but it is somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Moto G200 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Moto G200 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G200 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.