Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a global score of 86.2 against 78.8. Motorola Moto G200 5G's design is notably newer, but just a little thicker and way heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. Both devices in this review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. The Google Pixel 3a has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
Moto G200 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G200 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.