Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, getting an 86.2 score against 82.9. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is noticeably newer, but a little thicker and just a little heavier than the Google Pixel 4 XL. Moto G200 5G has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Moto G200 5G features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. Moto G200 5G features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.