Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, having a score of 87.5 against 86.2. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is older than Moto G200 5G, it's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the Moto G200 5G, they have the same internal storage.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G200 5G features better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.