Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. The Moto G200 5G design is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than HTC One M9's, but it's much heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has a newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, offering a couple nice extra features.
The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel amount per display inch. The Moto G200 5G counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The HTC One M9 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bits CPU. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a much better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.