Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. Although the Moto G200 5G is a lot newer than the HTC U Ultra, it's thicker and somewhat heavier. The HTC U Ultra features a bit better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each screen inch and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Moto G200 5G has a little bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM. HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto G200 5G features a greater camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Moto G200 5G has a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.