Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the HTC U11, getting a score of 86.2 against 77.6. The Moto G200 5G design is much newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than HTC U11. The Moto G200 5G features a bit faster processor than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
HTC U11 features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto G200 5G counts with slightly more memory for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G200 5G has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size. The Moto G200 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.